<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Faring for Fairer Trade &#8211; PART 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://citizenpolity.com/2010/01/07/faring-for-fairer-trade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://citizenpolity.com/2010/01/07/faring-for-fairer-trade/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 14:18:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://citizenpolity.com/2010/01/07/faring-for-fairer-trade/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 17:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citizenpolity.com/?p=381#comment-39</guid>
		<description>So then, how much are you making per pound, Mr. Watts? You claim transparency but you don&#039;t back it up. Show us how much you sell La Maravilla for and breakdown the profits made by each player in the supply chain, including Intellgentcia. That would be transparent. 

I don&#039;t take issue with your &quot;model&quot;, but calling it &quot;direct&quot; is misleading. Claiming it is &quot;transparent&quot; is misleading. And, last time I checked, 3 years is not &quot;long-term&quot;. There is a disconnect between your ideals and your marketing. 

Keep up the good work, but back off on the marketing hype. Before you know it, you&#039;ll be another Transfair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So then, how much are you making per pound, Mr. Watts? You claim transparency but you don&#8217;t back it up. Show us how much you sell La Maravilla for and breakdown the profits made by each player in the supply chain, including Intellgentcia. That would be transparent. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t take issue with your &#8220;model&#8221;, but calling it &#8220;direct&#8221; is misleading. Claiming it is &#8220;transparent&#8221; is misleading. And, last time I checked, 3 years is not &#8220;long-term&#8221;. There is a disconnect between your ideals and your marketing. </p>
<p>Keep up the good work, but back off on the marketing hype. Before you know it, you&#8217;ll be another Transfair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
